-
Abuse of Corporate form (legal personality, etc.)
-
"accepted"
Context: Germany - Philippines BIT (1997) and Protocol Article 1(1)
Defined in Agreement or Instrument
Elaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdictionElaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdiction
-
Abuse of Corporate form (legal personality, etc.)
-
"accepted"
Context: Germany - Philippines BIT (1997) and Protocol Article 1(1)
Defined in Agreement or Instrument
Elaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdictionElaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdiction
-
Abuse of Corporate form (legal personality, etc.)
-
"accepted"
Context: Germany - Philippines BIT (1997) and Protocol Article 1(1)
Defined in Agreement or Instrument
Elaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdictionElaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdiction
-
Abuse of Corporate form (legal personality, etc.)
-
"accepted"
Context: Germany - Philippines BIT (1997) and Protocol Article 1(1)
Defined in Agreement or Instrument
Elaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdictionElaborated upon in Jurisprudence
Azinian v. Mexico Award holds that the possibility of holding a State internationally liable for judicial dcisions does not, however, entitle a claimant to seek international review of the national court decisions as though the international jurisdiction seised has plenary appellate jurisdiction